7.4.22.4 - Checklist: Affray with face covering
Click here to obtain a Word version of this document for adaptation
Five elements the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt:
1. The accused used or threatened unlawful violence; and
2. The accused’s use or threat of violence was intentional or reckless; and
3. The accused’s conduct would cause a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to be terrified; and
4. The accused was wearing a face covering;
5. The accused was wearing the face covering primarily to [conceal their identity / protect themselves from the effects of a crowd-controlling substance]
Use or threaten unlawful violence
1. Did the accused use or threaten unlawful violence?
If yes, then go to 2
If no, then the accused is not guilty of affray with face covering
State of Mind
2. Was the accused’s use or threat of unlawful violence [intentional / reckless]?
[Consider – Reckless means aware that it was probable that the conduct involved unlawful violence]
If yes, then go to 3
If no, then the accused is not guilty of affray with face covering
Person of reasonable firmness would be terrified
3. Would the accused’s conduct have caused a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to be terrified?
If yes, then go to 4
If no, then the accused is not guilty of affray with face covering
Person of reasonable firmness would be terrified
4. Was the accused wearing a face covering when he/she used or threatened violence?
If yes, then go to 5
If no, then the accused is not guilty of affray with face covering
Person of reasonable firmness would be terrified
5. Was the accused’s primary purpose of wearing the face covering to [conceal his/her identity / protect himself/herself from the effects of a crowd-controlling substance]?
If yes, then the accused is guilty of affray with face covering (as long as you also answered yes to questions 1, 2, 3 and 4)
If no, then the accused is not guilty of affray with face covering
Last updated: 17 April 2019