Previous Topic

Next Topic

Book Contents

Book Index

7.5.17.2 - Checklist: Criminal Damage Intending to Endanger Life

Click here to obtain a Word version of this document

Four elements the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt:

1. The accused damaged or destroyed property; and

2. The accused purposely damaged or destroyed the property, or knew or believed that damage or destruction was the likely result of his or her actions; and

3. The accused purposely endangered the life of another person through the damage or destruction of property, or knew or believed that the life of another was likely to be endangered by that damage or destruction; and

4. The accused had no lawful excuse for damaging or destroying the property.

 

Damage or Destroy Property

1. Did the accused damage or destroy property?

If yes, then go to 2.1

If no, then the accused is not guilty of criminal damage intending to endanger life

State of Mind of Accused

2.1 Did the accused act with the purpose of damaging or destroying the property?

If yes, then go to 3.1

If no, then go to 2.2

2.2 Did the accused know or believe that his or her actions were more likely than not to damage or destroy the property?

Consider – It is not enough to show that the accused realised that damage or destruction might occur, or was possible.

If yes, then go to 3.1

If no, then the accused is not guilty of criminal damage intending to endanger life

Intending to Endanger Life

3.1 Did the accused damage or destroy the property with the purpose of endangering the life of another person?

If yes, then go to 4

If no, then go to 3.2

3.2 Did the accused know or believe that damaging or destroying the property was more likely than not to endanger the life of another person?

If yes, then go to 4

If no, then the accused is not guilty of criminal damage intending to endanger life

Without Lawful Excuse

4. Did the accused act without lawful excuse?

If yes, then the accused is guilty of criminal damage intending to endanger life (as long as you also answered yes to questions 1, 2.1 or 2.2 and 3.1 or 3.2)

If no, then the accused is not guilty of criminal damage intending to endanger life

Last updated: 30 May 2014

See Also

7.5.17 - Criminal Damage Intending to Endanger Life

7.5.17.1 - Charge: Criminal Damage Intending to Endanger Life