Previous Topic

Next Topic

Book Contents

Book Index

7.1.3.1 - Charge: Recklessness

Click here to obtain a Word version of this document for adaptation

For you to be satisfied that the accused’s actions were reckless, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that when NOA [insert details of relevant actions], [he/she] knew that [his/her] actions would probably cause [insert details of relevant consequence], but [he/she] went ahead with [his/her] actions anyway.

It is not enough for NOA to have known that [insert details of relevant consequence] might possibly occur. For this element to be satisfied, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that NOA knew that [insert details of relevant consequence] would probably result from [his/her] actions.

 

Last updated: 2 July 2020

See Also

7.1.3 - Recklessness