Click here to obtain a Word version of this document for adaptation.
[This charge should only be given if:
If the evidence of incriminating conduct also includes lies, this direction should be adapted and added to Charge: Lies as Incriminating Conduct (Section 21 direction).
If defence counsel requests a warning about the dangers of relying on evidence of incriminating conduct, also give Charge: Additional direction on incriminating conduct (Section 22 direction).
If a direction is sought to minimise the risk of the jury wrongly using evidence as incriminating conduct, see Charge: Avoiding Risk of Improper Use of Conduct Evidence (Section 23 direction)]
In this trial, the prosecution argued that you can use the evidence that NOA [identify other conduct relied on as incriminating conduct] as evidence that s/he believed that [describe relevant admission, for example ‘s/he committed the offence charged’ or ‘s/he shot the deceased’, or ‘s/he shot the deceased without acting in self-defence’.]
You may only use this evidence in this way if you find that this conduct occurred and the only reasonable explanation of this conduct is that the accused believed that [describe relevant belief, for example ‘s/he committed the offence and needed to dispose of evidence’].
However, I must warn you that even if you find that the accused believed that s/he committed the offence charged, you must consider all the evidence when deciding whether the prosecution has proved the accused’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
[Insert section 22 direction here if required. See Charge: Additional direction on incriminating conduct (Section 22 direction)]
[Identify relevant evidence and refer to relevant prosecution and defence arguments. As part of this, the judge should, in relation to each offence:
Incriminating conduct and unreliable evidence
[If necessary, add a direction on using evidence of incriminating conduct to support evidence covered by an “unreliable evidence” direction]
Last updated: 27 March 2019